I've run three 1:35s in this race (2007, 2008, 2010), one magnificent 1:32 (2008), and a respectable 1:34 this year. That was good enough for 80th overall, 14th in my age group, a 7:10/mile pace. It's a amazing to me that the difference between my 1:32:07 and my 1:34:01 is a measly 7 seconds/mile. It all adds up. I ran Thunder Road one month after a slow 1:36:10 for the Athens Half in October. What I learned from the Athens Half is that I really do need to start conservatively. I think I could have run Athens faster, but I started slowly and cautiously sped up to a low 7-minute/mile pace. Actually, given the training that I did, I was suprised to get a 1:36 in Athens. So I took the same strategy to Charlotte and I like the results. Below are my mile splits for the Charlotte half. Mile 2 is a bit of a mystery and the 6:57 was a bit of a shock. The last mile is uphill. Overall, the negative splits suggests that this is way that I run as a middle-aged athlete.
Splits
- 7:13
- 7:42
- 7:16
- 7:08
- 7:12
- 6:57
- 7:07
- 7:07
- 7:05
- 7:03
- 7:05
- 7:05
- 7:17
I'd like to find another half marathon in December or January or Februrary that is close but the only ones I'm finding are suspicious looking.
I'm so impressed with your speed. It's remarkable to me with my 9 minute mile. I'm gradually joining the ranks of crazy obsessive runners and I'm considering training for a big race in 2013. I don't want to say the M word for fear that I'll jinx it, but maybe a half?
ReplyDeleteWhat would make a half marathon look suspicious?
Sorry for the pokey reply. A suspicious half marathon is something that has a weird name like "Carol's Half Marathon Series" and that is multiple laps around a city or county park. I've done one half that included bike paths and while I PR'ed according to the race, I'm pretty sure it was short.
Delete